[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
New, larger telescope mounts
- To: tass@wwa.com
- Subject: New, larger telescope mounts
- From: "Merle W. Jephson-King" <mjking@wi.net>
- Date: Tue, 05 May 1998 22:58:37 -0500
- Old-Return-Path: <mjking@wi.net>
- Reply-To: mjking@wi.net
- Resent-Date: Fri, 8 May 1998 00:06:05 -0400
- Resent-From: tass@wwa.com
- Resent-Message-ID: <"devQa.A.UUH.oQoU1"@kani.wwa.com>
- Resent-Sender: tass-request@wwa.com
Please don't be dismayed by the prospect of making a larger mount for
four larger TASS cameras. Whether you want to point your 35mm camera
or a 4-meter reflector at the heavens, the design principles are the
same.
I recommend that we use an equatorial mount similar to the English
type. You can make the mount out of steel tubing and off-the-shelf
bearings. The rule of thumb is that a hollow shaft is stiffer in
bending than a solid shaft because you have a combination of tension,
compression and shear stresses. Also, I/c is larger which lowers the
stress. If you take a hollow shaft to the extreme and make the wall
as thin as foil, you then have a cylindrical membrane which is subject
to local buckling. Fortunately, the mount doesn't need to fly and how
much it weighs will only change its status from portable to fixed.
Use pillow block bearings. The ball bearing grease type provides
positive lubrication and is relatively cheap. Pillow blocks are
bolted to the rest of the structure.
You can hand calculate the stresses and deflections of all the parts
and get good results. Don't sneer. The fore-runners of the box in
front of you were designed with slide rules and analog calculators.
Today's hand held calculators are _much_ more powerful than the
calculators of 30 years ago.
"Roark's Formulas for Stress and Strain" by Warren C. Young contains
enough formulas to completely analyze the TASS scope mount. Also, the
HP 48 calculator carries 12 significant figures in its calculations
which is sufficient accuracy for TASS (many other things as well).
What I'm trying to say is that a mount can be designed and built for
TASS without doing a FEA (Finite Element Analysis) with a big number
cruncher.
Keep the design simple and statically determinate and the results will
be just fine. Something you could write home about.
Merle King