[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: TASS Discovers 13 "new" objects, maybe?
- To: tass@wwa.com
- Subject: Re: TASS Discovers 13 "new" objects, maybe?
- From: aah@nofs.navy.mil
- Date: Mon, 25 May 98 08:51:50 -0700
- Old-Return-Path: <aah@nofs.navy.mil>
- Resent-Date: Mon, 25 May 1998 12:03:30 -0400
- Resent-From: tass@wwa.com
- Resent-Message-ID: <"KWuXJ.A.WAH.ZVZa1"@kani.wwa.com>
- Resent-Sender: tass-request@wwa.com
Rereading Chris' message, I see why he only gets 6 hits/star, since Glenn
was the third data source and his cameras are pointed south. I thought
on first reading that Mike G.'s system was the third source.
However, I'm a little surprised that he only gets 6 hits even so, since
there are always a few cases where crowded fields will give more than one
object within a reasonable match radius. I would have expected a handful
of objects with >6 observations. Also, is there really no overlap at all
between Glenn and Tom/Nick?
Arne