Re: Saturation Improvements

[Andrew Bennett <andrew.bennett@ns.sympatico.ca>]

On Fri, 29 Sep 2000 18:44:48 -0500, Tom Droege 
<tdroege@veriomail.com> wrote:

>A plea to CCD-World brought some advice on how to fix the problem with 
>saturated stars.
>...
>looking at a saturated star near the bottom of the frame with various VVH 
>levels.  4.1  (old value was 6) volts proved to be best.  With this level, 
>the saturated star level is close to the same top and bottom, and the full 
>well signal is somewhat larger.  Looks like another bug has been beaten to 
>a pulp.
Congratulations!

My laziness in not implementing a variable level across the image
when classifying stars as saturated has been triumphantly
vindicated. I need to change only one number in the entire set
of programs. On second thoughts, I will just leave the number
as it is. Masterly inactivity ...

Andrew Bennett, Avondale Vineyard, Nova Scotia, Canada.