[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: FITS tables
Jure, you are correct: I was thinking of the most basic
raw starlist as the lowest common denominator. Once these
are created, then anyone who doesn't have a Mark IV site
could gain access and help in the processing. Fully
photometrically calibrated starlists are quite involved
and usually require at minimum the matching of the V & I
images taken of that field and so were beyond my discussion.
I've also taken way too much of the bandwidth devoted
to this discussion and will now become just a listener
for a couple of weeks while I try to do work-related projects.
Arne
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: FITS tables
- From: Chris Albertson <chris@216-178-250-236.lax1.phoenixdsl.net>