[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
"Getting Ready To Get Ready"
Hello Tom & All,
Now that spring is here (and work has quieted down a bit) I am really
getting excited about getting a Mark IV installed and up and running here in
Dayton collecting data again !! It looks like Tom might have MICHEL and
GLENN ready for a trip to Ohio about the first week in July (that’s based on
where things are now)..I guess Tom will fill in the details as he getting
both systems ready to make a trip east.
I was reviewing some of the e-mail from last fall to now and was trying to
come up with a ‘game plan’ for the Mark IV when it finally getting installed
here in Dayton. The following list is what I had in mind …after reviewing
the comments that Arne, Doug and Michael have made over the last six months
or so.
1). Get GLENN installed and running here in Dayton, I have an enclosure that
has been used for the Mark III Camera here but is probably too small and
will have to replaced to house GLENN when it gets here. It will take some
time (it always does) to get GLENN installed, the control software installed
and data reduction pipeline flowing. (This will take several months at least
but I hope some useful data can be taken during this period of time as
well).
Question for Chris..Will the Linux Mark IV control program be operational
by then??..Say mid-summer or should I plan on using Tom’s Quick Basic
program for a while to collect data ?? It would be helpful if you could look
into your ‘crystal ball’ and see what you think might be best to use for
getting the camera here in Dayton up and running with.
2). The data reduction pipeline will be worked on along with the data
collection from the Mark IV when it gets here. Some of the first data
probably will not be that good..it will get better as the operation and
techniques improve here..but I am sure it will take several months of hard
work to get everything somewhat ‘automated’ and flowing…the Mark IV is much
more complex than the Mark III and the data issues are also more complex too
than those associated with the Mark III.
I intend to try both Arne’s IRAF scripts as well as Michael’s data
reduction pipeline and see which is better suited for use here. I can have
the same computer running both suites of reduction software and see which is
easier to automate here in Dayton.
3). I would like to pick out some different fields to look at over and over
again during the later summer to early fall period of time. It will probably
be easier to leave the Mark IV camera fixed in Declination and just collect
data looking at the same fields a number of times each clear night. This is
something that the Mark III just was not well suited for, basically getting
one ‘V” band and two ‘I” band measurements per night at most. This would
allow getting some interesting light-curves (and finding some new short
period variables as well) over the course of the later summer and fall here
in Dayton.
This will also serve as a way to ‘calibrate and tweak’ the data reduction
pipeline as well as to gather some useful data that could be used as a start
on the Mark IV dB (what ever that turns out to be).
4). The other thing that I have been giving some serious thought to is give
Mike G’s ‘Planet Hunting’ proposal a try and see what we can come up with.
there are several other amateurs here in town with automated LX-200’s that
could be called on to make follow-up measurements on suspected candidates..
All-and-all it looks like a very exciting summer and fall. (as long as we
can keep Tom chained to the work bench checking out Mark IV systems (he he).
Glenn G.
_________________________________________________________________
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com