[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Michael's Pipeline
Michael has done a really great job of writing up his pipeline. See:
http://spiff.rit.edu/tass/pipeline/pipeline.html
I must say that I have never seen such a nice write up for such a
project. I once supervised 17 systems programmers. They did not tell me
what they were doing much less write it up in a form that could be
understood by me. Great work Michael! OK, I can understand it, but I
probably could not make it through the process. I have just not worked
with make files and C compilers. But I do understand each step. That is
very nice.
I printed it out, all 19 pages and have been carrying it around with me
reading it. There are a few problem spots for me. I will comment later.
I would think that any of you that are competent with Linux and such stuff
should be able to get this pipeline working with all this
documentation. But what do I know! I have watched Michael and others do C
compilations. I observe thousands of error messages scroll down the
screen. Then they pick out one, ignoring the rest, make a minor change and
everything runs. Sigh! Some day I hope to be able to do that, but for the
moment I am struggling with why TOM sometimes writes junk.
Yes, the problem is still there. The current theory is that it is a
humidity problem. (An even later theory is that it is a clock line driver
problem. We just had the Stamp board down on the test stand and found a
clock driver that was working but looked sick. In any case the signals
firmed up when we changed the 274.)
I really want to support Michael's efforts. I hope that many of you
download his stuff, and try running the pipeline. I assume (Correct me
Michael) that we will operate Linux/gnu like and all make contributions to
the code. I further assume that Michael is the "Chief" for this pipeline
and gets to approve changes/additions.
It is my further hope, that one of you will compile this code, and make a
plain vanilla cd rom from it that will run on my Linux machine.
If anyone not already on the Disk 18 distribution wants to work on this I
will mail as many test disks as you can stand. I actually ended up with 3
extra sets as I went mad while duplicating. I went through a box of 200
CDs plus some others I had left from the last batch. You really do want a
lot of files to make the flat field give you a decent answer. In my
experience this is 20 or so. This is why I filled a complete CD for each
night of operation for set 18. I could have put one or two frames from
each night on one CD. But then you could not do a very good job of flat
fielding. Eventually I will dig out the flat field box and try to furnish
flat fields as part of the data distributions. 18j has a bias frame on ti.
Tom Droege