[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Wednesday Night Data
Data Wednesday night consisted of two runs:
1) Flat. This took 25 data frames moving forward in RA about 1 degree
after each frame. The first, second and every 8th frame was dark. This
gave 21 object frames and 4 dark frames. Each was of 100 second
exposure. The darks were median combined (their mean levels were equal to
within the noise) for a master dark, and the 21 object frames were median
combined for a master flat.
2) Follow. The sky was followed with 100 second exposures. One every 189
seconds. There were 50 exposures taken of the same field. Tracking error
was a little over 200 pixels N-S and 40 pixels E-W. This means that 90% or
so of the stars should appear on all 50 frames. This run covered about 2.6
hours. I applied the master dark and master flat to one of these
images. The result looked very flat. I was about to make a quantitative
measurement of "very flat" when we had a power outage and I lost the dark
and flat which I had not yet saved. ;^)
I co-added two of these frames and the noise level decreased by the
expected square root 2. One then found about 40% more stars using the same
settings. Looks like one frame has 3000 or so stars at 5 sigma. One might
want to co-add 4 or so frames together and thus get more sensitive
measurements and increased interval.
The stars are as round as I have seen, and consistent in shape with the
observed drift.
If anyone cares, the frames are centered at 20h10m, 04:25N
The fits headers are close enough on these runs that one can easily
identify star fields.
I plan to run in this mode through the winter. This data should be useful
for the discovery of short period variable stars.
Does anyone want Wednesday's data to start developing a pipeline? This
would be Data Set 19. Unless the experts are pulling my leg, I would
expect that something new will be found on each data set as above. To ask
for Data Set 19, send me a mail message with your name and address.
Tom Droege.