[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Data Set 19 Ready to Go
I really like my Burn Proof CD with the Nero software. It is easy to use
and the menus do the right things. The HP software was awful and I spent
much time trying to figure out why it had filled up the directory withe
duplicates of the files I wanted to burn. The Nero software does all the
right things.
I have spent the day in front of two machines just burning CDs. Of course
the Windows machine crashes frequently if you try to do anything else. No,
I could accept if it blew writing a disk, but it just crashes.
Data Set 19 should make it out in the morning mail. There is still time to
ask for a copy.
I plan to make this the basis of the software contest if anyone takes me up
on it. So far the response has been underwhelming. Unless a few of you
show some interest I will drop the project.
I think there is some misunderstanding about what I want. This is really a
project to write scripts that are friendly to use that drive existing
software. This could be Michael's code, Arne's code, IRAF, whatever. But
I need a friendly package that I can load on an average fast machine and
process data disks to star lists without knowing how to program in C++ or
whatever. I am willing to struggle with minimal instruction by trial and
error.
A winning package would include:
1) The public domain programs and how to load them on an average
machine. DOS, Windows (your choice) or Linux.
2) A script that reduces DS-19 to star lists. This probably has a bunch of
sub sections. Make a dark, make a flat, find stars, do photometric
corrections, etc.. I will spell this out in a little more detail if
several of you bite.
3) A script that makes plots when pointed at a directory that contains a
bunch of measurements of a single star.
4) Enough comments in the scrips to give me a fighting chance.
Some of you might worry that I am a loose canon and will rush off and
publish data that I don't understand. Do not fear. Any publication from
this will be labeled "preliminary engineering data" or some such. I have a
plan for what I want to do with the TOM's and I want to start taking data
and looking at it to see if my plan is reasonable. I figure that I am not
(yet) qualified to really munch data and to be sure that I will get
everything possible from it. That is why I will always keep the raw
data. Arne may throw away raw data but then he knows enough to do
this. Not me, yet.
Tom Droege