[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
gork Re: Frame to frame differences
In the files I sent, swap the file names sequential.v
and sequential.i - ie the v data is in the i file and
...
Rob
---- Robert Creager <robert@carolinecreager.com>
wrote:
>
> Here is another set of data (reduced with sps2x vs
> sextractor), broken in to V and I band
> files, along with a gnuplot file to plot them out.
>
> If you have gnuplot, execute <gnuplot
> sequential.dem>. It'll plot out 4 graphs for you,
> with titles and such. You have to hit return
between
> each graph. Definate trending of data through out
the
> night.
>
> Later,
> Rob
>
> PS. If the attachments don't come though, I'll send
> them again tonight...
>
>
> ---- Tom Droege <tdroege@veriomail.com> wrote:
> > Rob and all,
> >
> > I plotted the data below. The V data is
> consistently less than the I
> > data. This is strange since both telescopes are
on
> the same drive. I just
> > plotted the last column which I believe to be E-W
> axis. The results look
> > pretty trend less to me, though there is the
> possibility that the drive
> > rate is trailing off near the end of the V data.
> This is the kind of
> > effect I expect, the rate changes at the limit.
But
> this is too little
> > data to draw much of a conclusion, I think.
> >
> > In any case, V and I data should have the same
mean
> rate. They do not.
> >
> > Tom Droege
> >
> >
> > At 06:25 PM 10/16/01 -0600, you wrote:
> >
> > >Ok,
> > >
> > >Here's some data. Note that this is produced
from
> an un-qualified pipeline,
> > >but at least the results look reasonable :-)
This
> data was gathered by
> > >using Michael's match program (linear match), a
> Perl script, and the output
> > >from one stage of my pipeline. The first number
is
> the rotation between the
> > >frames listed (atan c/b) converted to degrees.
The
> second is the X offset
> > >(a), and the third is the Y offset (d). There
are
> some frames missing as I
> > >didn't get good catalog matches from them. If I
> re-run the pipeline using
> > >raw images (vs dark/flat corrected images), I
will
> get more catalog matched
> > >images, but I think this provides some reasonable
> data (doesn't it?).
> > >
> > >I'd be happy to run again on raw images if anyone
> would like. Or do some
> > >graphing with the data. Gotta run right now
> though.
> > >
> > >Matching hira2157630.fits to hira2157632.fits:
Bad
> match
> > >Matching hira2157632.fits to hira2157634.fits:
> 0.0025 -6.03 0.30
> > >Matching hira2157638.fits to hira2157639.fits:
> 0.0029 -5.85 0.33
> > >Matching hira2157639.fits to hira2157641.fits:
Bad
> match
> > >Matching hira2157641.fits to hira2157643.fits:
Bad
> match
> > >Matching hira2157646.fits to hira2157648.fits:
Bad
> match
> > >Matching hira2157652.fits to hira2157653.fits:
Bad
> match
> > >Matching hira2157653.fits to hira2157655.fits:
Bad
> match
> > >Matching hira2157655.fits to hira2157657.fits:
> 0.0041 -5.62 0.40
> > >Matching hira2157657.fits to hira2157659.fits:
> 0.0037 -5.48 0.48
> > >Matching hira2157659.fits to hira2157661.fits:
> 0.0040 -5.72 0.44
> > >Matching hira2157661.fits to hira2157662.fits:
> 0.0042 -5.60 0.37
> > >Matching hira2157666.fits to hira2157668.fits:
> 0.0055 -5.54 0.30
> > >Matching hira2157668.fits to hira2157669.fits:
> 0.0059 -5.49 0.39
> > >Matching hira2157669.fits to hira2157671.fits:
> 0.0050 -5.42 0.41
> > >Matching hira2157684.fits to hira2157685.fits:
> 0.0076 -5.29 0.21
> > >
> > >Matching hvra2157623.fits to hvra2157625.fits:
Bad
> match
> > >Matching hvra2157625.fits to hvra2157627.fits:
> 0.0016 -5.92 0.15
> > >Matching hvra2157627.fits to hvra2157629.fits:
> 0.0027 -6.00 0.18
> > >Matching hvra2157629.fits to hvra2157630.fits:
Bad
> match
> > >Matching hvra2157630.fits to hvra2157632.fits:
> 0.0026 -5.87 0.19
> > >Matching hvra2157632.fits to hvra2157634.fits:
> 0.0028 -5.91 0.11
> > >Matching hvra2157638.fits to hvra2157639.fits:
> 0.0032 -5.81 0.09
> > >Matching hvra2157639.fits to hvra2157641.fits:
> 0.0039 -5.83 0.15
> > >Matching hvra2157641.fits to hvra2157643.fits:
Bad
> match
> > >Matching hvra2157643.fits to hvra2157645.fits:
Bad
> match
> > >Matching hvra2157645.fits to hvra2157646.fits:
Bad
> match
> > >Matching hvra2157646.fits to hvra2157648.fits:
> 0.0040 -5.80 0.20
> > >Matching hvra2157652.fits to hvra2157653.fits:
> 0.0047 -5.75 0.26
> > >Matching hvra2157653.fits to hvra2157655.fits:
> 0.0051 -5.65 0.18
> > >Matching hvra2157655.fits to hvra2157657.fits:
> 0.0056 -5.69 0.12
> > >Matching hvra2157657.fits to hvra2157659.fits:
> 0.0054 -5.63 0.30
> > >Matching hvra2157659.fits to hvra2157661.fits:
> 0.0053 -5.63 0.13
> > >Matching hvra2157661.fits to hvra2157662.fits:
> 0.0058 -5.58 0.17
> > >Matching hvra2157666.fits to hvra2157668.fits:
Bad
> match
> > >Matching hvra2157668.fits to hvra2157669.fits:
> 0.0063 -5.45 0.15
> > >Matching hvra2157669.fits to hvra2157671.fits:
> 0.0063 -5.42 0.33
> > >Matching hvra2157671.fits to hvra2157673.fits:
> 0.0057 -5.41 0.08
> > >Matching hvra2157673.fits to hvra2157675.fits:
> 0.0073 -5.38 0.13
> > >Matching hvra2157675.fits to hvra2157677.fits:
> 0.0061 -5.38 0.15
> > >Matching hvra2157680.fits to hvra2157682.fits:
> 0.0064 -5.25 0.16
> > >Matching hvra2157682.fits to hvra2157684.fits:
Bad
> match
> > >Matching hvra2157684.fits to hvra2157685.fits:
> 0.0072 -5.27 0.10
> > >Matching hvra2157685.fits to hvra2157687.fits:
Bad
> match
> > >Matching hvra2157687.fits to hvra2157689.fits:
> 0.0079 -5.25 0.21
> > >Matching hvra2157689.fits to hvra2157691.fits:
> 0.0075 -5.18 0.01
> > >Matching hvra2157694.fits to hvra2157696.fits:
> 0.0077 -5.07 -0.05
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >Robert Creager
> > >Senior Software Engineer
> > >Client Server Library
> > >303.673.2365 V
> > >303.661.5379 F
> > >888.912.4458 P
> > >StorageTek
> > >INFORMATION made POWERFUL
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>