Good Results

[Tom Droege <tdroege2@earthlink.net>]

John and all,

OK, it should be obvious that we need to do something with the good 
results.  First, it is not my intention to keep any data secret or prevent 
anyone from publishing it.  Just refer to tass when you do.  But that is 
not a rule, only good manners.

I am working on an engineering paper.  Perhaps we can save the nice ones 
from DS23 for the engineering paper.  I don't see any lack of good 
candidates for the paper whenever I get it out.  In any case, we will have 
to figure out what to do with the tass data eventually.

My general view is that I am not a variable star expert.  I do not plan to 
try to classify each one.  I am pretty good at getting measurements 
made.  So what I want to do is take measurements and then make them 
available to those that want to do classification.  I know that this is 
only part of the job.   It is what I can do.  It might also be worthwhile 
to put up a list of "interesting stars that need classification".

I assume that at some point we will put up a 50xcat or some such with the 
data from +7 degrees.  Input from experts is welcome.

One thing is for sure.  All this is keeping me productively busy in 
retirement.  This is what it was planned to do.  So remember, by objective 
might be different from yours.  I am trying to have fun.  As long as I have 
fun, I will keep at it.  You are welcome to have fun too.  I would not 
expect you to be hanging around if it were not fun.

Tom Droege

At 04:14 PM 6/1/02 +0000, you wrote:
>Tom Droege wrote:
> >
> > John,
> >
> > Yep, this one is 4 stars on my list.
> >
> > Tom
> >
>see attached gif, a 5 star one maybes?
>
>John