Re: Modified WS

[jg <jg@jgws.freeisp.co.uk>]

Patrick Wils wrote:

> The last two values are large for long period variables.  It seems that
> the I value is often inexplicably large compared to the V value, which
> might indicate a problem in the night to night calibration.  The V
> value seems more acceptable.  The star in the July data set with the
> largest V range is John's eclipsing binary GSC 396-1222, and SS Her is
> in third place.

This is very nice indeed.

I only noticed GSC 0396-1222 as a consequence of plotting up every
lightcurve for every object one by one for descending WS index, so
didn't notice this one till I got to it.

This "2 dimensional" [well, multidimensional] approach obviously makes
this one stick out more prominently.

Good stuff.

Cheers

John G.