Re: re HD 155229

[Michael Koppelman <lolife@bitstream.net>]

What have you got, Tom? It's looking clear tonight. I don't have 
anything against eclipsers, so there are some good one's on this 
page:

http://a188-l009.rit.edu/tass/data/july_2002/short_period.html

...I just thought it would be fun to try something new, since my 
first two papers are EW's. What would be great is to find an 
eclipser that turned out to be a CV. Stir up the soup a bit. Or 
an eclipser with a nice total eclipse.

Any ideas, let me know, otherwise I'll probably take a look at 
HD 155229 so we can at the worst cross it off the list.

Michael K.

On Saturday, August 10, 2002, at 03:47  PM, Tom Droege wrote:

> Having said this, you might want to avoid stars that are 
> flagged as saturated.  Put your effort into the clearly 
> variable stars until we learn a little more about our 
> calibrations from night to night.  I think we have enough to 
> keep you busy.  I can always find you more to work on.
>