Re: GSC 00475-00042

[Tom Droege <tdroege2@earthlink.net>]

Just looking for something for Michael K.

OK, a little more looking turned up AT Peg and UV Psc along with two others 
that don't seem to be listed.

319.6642+6.2049 changed .5 mag in a day
44.8329+6.7287 changed .4 mag in a day

Looks like one is in a position where you can see it without staying up too 
late.

Note that neither changes much in the 16 minutes of coverage.  That does 
not tell you much.

You might just make a list of longer period variables and run through the 
list each night.

Tom Droege

At 01:27 PM 9/6/02 -0500, you wrote:
>I'm having a hard time finding any good candidates in the August data set. 
>Most high WS statistics are night to night variations and are either false 
>positives or, at best, longer period variables. Where should I point my 
>scope tonight?
>
>Michael
>
>On Friday, September 6, 2002, at 01:17  AM, Patrick Wils wrote:
>
>>
>>I would be very suspicious of this one, because the data are from the
>>night with the ice crystal on the V camera.  The variation probably
>>isn't real.
>