Re: Host big file

[Tom Droege <tdroege2@earthlink.net>]

Mike,

I am interested to see if this did get straightened out.  It seems to me 
that Michael Koppelman should know.  What say Michael, does the time of the 
tass minimums etc.. line up with the minimums of the data you have been 
taking??  This should be a good test.

Tom Droege


At 07:57 PM 10/27/02 -0600, you wrote:
>Tom,
>
>These look like the threads where it was discussed.
>http://www.tass-survey.org/tass/mailarchive/2001-12/msg00049.html
>http://www.tass-survey.org/tass/mailarchive/2001-10/msg00018.html
>Following the threads, I'm not sure if you tried changing model.bas, or
>if you did and this is a different problem.
>
>At least I know why it looked familiar :-)
>
>     > >
>     > > Subject: Re: Notes on Disk Set 19
>     > > Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2001 18:18:21 -0500
>     > > From: Michael Sallman <msallman@pro-ns.net>
>     > > To: Tass <tass@listserv.wwa.com>
>     > > References: <4.2.2.20011015215827.00de0350@pop.veriomail.com>
>     > >
>     > > Tom,
>     > >
>     > > I just took a quick look at model.bas and noticed this:
>     > >
>     > > TilNow# = JulianDay# - 2451545.5#       ' Days since Jan 1, 2000
>     > > midnight
>     > >
>     > > If Jan 1, 2000 midnight is 1/1/2000 0h UT, I think it should be
>     > > 2451544.5.
>     > >
>     > > I haven't had a chance to test it out (though it does add the 1
>day),
>     > > but I thought I'd at least mention it in case it's obvious to
>you (or
>     > > someone else) if this is the problem or not.
>     > >
>
>Mike
>
>Tom Droege wrote:
>
>    > Michael,
>    >
>    > I think the file names are just recopied by Michael's pipeline. If the
>    > final date time is not correct, then we should know about it.  This is
>    > something that I hoed someone else would correct.
>    >
>    > Tom Droege
>    >
>    > At 10:37 AM 10/27/02 -0600, you wrote:
>    >
>    > > Tom,
>    > >
>    > > The disks arrived safely yesterday.
>    > > Disk1 : Mhra2241518.cal - Mhra2398580.cal
>    > > Disk2 : Mhra2403591.cal - Mhra2547520.cal
>    > > I notice that the file names (Mhra2547520) don't match the JD
>    > > (2452548.52022). I thought that had gotten fixed. Or maybe I'm
>    > > thinking of something similar. Not a big deal, as I assume the JD in
>    > > each individual record is correct.
>    > >
>    > > I will try to get things set up in the next week or so to make the
>    > > data accessible.
>    > >
>    > > Mike
>    >
>    >
>    >
>
>
>
>
>
>