[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Host big file
Michael,
OK, it looks like the data is OK, it is just the file name that is
misleading. The file name is a convenience for me to take the data. It
should not be used as an indication of the time the data was taken. So I
think I just don't care. If you want data for a specific date/time, then
one should look in the fits header where it is correct. At least I think
it is correct there per Michael Koppelman.
I will listen to arguments to do this differently. But note that I still
hope that someone else will write proper data taking code. Stuff from Rob
and Michael looks like it will replace my QBasic code shortly. So I am not
very interested in doing cosmetic things to my QB code.
Tom
At 07:57 PM 10/27/02 -0600, you wrote:
>Tom,
>
>These look like the threads where it was discussed.
>http://www.tass-survey.org/tass/mailarchive/2001-12/msg00049.html
>http://www.tass-survey.org/tass/mailarchive/2001-10/msg00018.html
>Following the threads, I'm not sure if you tried changing model.bas, or
>if you did and this is a different problem.
>
>At least I know why it looked familiar :-)
>
> > >
> > > Subject: Re: Notes on Disk Set 19
> > > Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2001 18:18:21 -0500
> > > From: Michael Sallman <msallman@pro-ns.net>
> > > To: Tass <tass@listserv.wwa.com>
> > > References: <4.2.2.20011015215827.00de0350@pop.veriomail.com>
> > >
> > > Tom,
> > >
> > > I just took a quick look at model.bas and noticed this:
> > >
> > > TilNow# = JulianDay# - 2451545.5# ' Days since Jan 1, 2000
> > > midnight
> > >
> > > If Jan 1, 2000 midnight is 1/1/2000 0h UT, I think it should be
> > > 2451544.5.
> > >
> > > I haven't had a chance to test it out (though it does add the 1
>day),
> > > but I thought I'd at least mention it in case it's obvious to
>you (or
> > > someone else) if this is the problem or not.
> > >
>
>Mike
>
>Tom Droege wrote:
>
> > Michael,
> >
> > I think the file names are just recopied by Michael's pipeline. If the
> > final date time is not correct, then we should know about it. This is
> > something that I hoed someone else would correct.
> >
> > Tom Droege
> >
> > At 10:37 AM 10/27/02 -0600, you wrote:
> >
> > > Tom,
> > >
> > > The disks arrived safely yesterday.
> > > Disk1 : Mhra2241518.cal - Mhra2398580.cal
> > > Disk2 : Mhra2403591.cal - Mhra2547520.cal
> > > I notice that the file names (Mhra2547520) don't match the JD
> > > (2452548.52022). I thought that had gotten fixed. Or maybe I'm
> > > thinking of something similar. Not a big deal, as I assume the JD in
> > > each individual record is correct.
> > >
> > > I will try to get things set up in the next week or so to make the
> > > data accessible.
> > >
> > > Mike
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
>
>
>