[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: HD932 data
Very nice data.
On Thursday, December 5, 2002, at 09:22 PM, Rolling Hills Obs ((Shawn
D)) wrote:
> Here's the data I gathered on 11/29 for HD932. A V filter was used
> with a
> CB245 on an LX200-10". Each point is an average of three 60s
> exposures. The
> internal error reported by sextractor is <0.01mag, and the standard
> error
> from the three-point averages is also <0.01. The gaps occurred when
> the
> scattered clouds became too thick and the data got too noisy.
>
> The graph shows the nice, smooth curve which reached a minimum (using
> AVE)
> at HJD = 2452608.6482 +/- 0.0003. To my non-professional eye it looks
> like
> an EB, but we need to see more of the curve to have a better idea.
> Given
> that the period looks to be around 1 day (darn it), I didn't collect
> any
> data on 11/30, and it's been somewhat cloudy here for the past few
> days.
> Hopefully this storm that's brushing us, and dumping lots of snow and
> ice up
> north, will pass by tomorrow so I can collect some additional data.
>
> Shawn
>
> <HD932.gif>
- References:
- HD932 data
- From: "Rolling Hills Obs \(Shawn D\)" <rollinghillsobs@cfl.rr.com>