[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: GSC 748-1618

To: Tom Droege <tdroege2@earthlink.net>, Tass <tass@listserv.wwa.com>, Michael Koppelman <lolife@bitstream.net>
Subject: Re: GSC 748-1618
From: Michael Sallman <msallman@pro-ns.net>
Date: Mon, 17 Feb 2003 18:36:31 -0600
In-Reply-To: <5.0.0.25.2.20030217155950.02cb87a0@pop.earthlink.net>
References: <5.0.0.25.2.20030217155950.02cb87a0@pop.earthlink.net>
Sender: owner-tass@listserv.wwa.com
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.2b) Gecko/20021016

Tom and all,


Tom Droege wrote:

> These must be matched up in time.  We keep pairs of measurements
> taken at the same time and throw away all the others.  Now we can derive
> a delta measurement from the comparison star as Michael R suggests.
>
> OK Michael S.  This looks like a job for S Michael man.  ( How did tass
> attract all these Michaels?)
> Ask your data base the above question for GSC748-1618.  Should be a fun
> project.

Sure, no problem. Well, 1 problem. I don't seem to have the information 
regarding the comp star(s). Michael K ?

Mike

Follow-Ups:
- Re: GSC 748-1618
  - From: Michael Sallman <msallman@pro-ns.net>

References:
- Re: GSC 748-1618
  - From: Tom Droege <tdroege2@earthlink.net>

Prev by Date: Re: GSC 748-1618
Next by Date: Re: Tool Needed
Prev by thread: Re: GSC 748-1618
Next by thread: Re: GSC 748-1618
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread