Good people,
because discrete variations in the Earth’s characteristics that’re localized in any particular area, apart from their being dependent on the prevalent conditions of a given area and, by extension, those that constitute the immediate surroundings, they’re also accentuated by the Sun due to the fact that it’s the immediate common center of our Planetary System, with the said changes –owing to the dictates of entropy and the second thermodynamic law- then, it could be said, being multiplied by Planck’s constant per the conditions given in a respective ambience. This gives the stated changes miniscule or ‘negligible’ properties.
So, of the above, one could go on and say that were it to be given expression in the form of an equation, it could be written as follows:
Changes attributable to conditions of a particular area = [Rate of energy pressure (as these variations’re essentially of energy by nature) applied/Area/Inertia characteristic of that area that can be symbolized by variations of the locale’s magnetic field –a certain empiric value could be assigned to the said area]x[Planck’s constant, h, per temp, t, (their product being expressive of the constant inherent or latent dynamism of a given ambience), h.t]x[Sun’s variable energy impact on the locale (as a measure of changes that it induces on the particular locality)/Locale’s area]x[Inverse of the Sun’s square of its radial distance from the particular point on Earth]. The foregoing then translates to:
[Rate of applied energy pressure. Area’s inertia/Area]x[h.t]x[Variable energy from the Sun/Area.Radius squared].
Nyankami.