Re: Big Bang, I Wonder ?

[Nyankami Atandi <m_atandi@yahoo.com>]

Chris,
If We May Refresh Our Minds, the initial concept
Attributed to the Universe’s expansion Was that It Was
the Result of a Great Explosion going by the name the
Big Bang. Later, In Order to Standardize the different
schools of thought under one banner, Was the
Singularity –which concept I’ve qualms about-
beginning festooned on it. I am a bit Surprised when
you Say It Was a Gross Over-simplification Meant For
The General Public. What Do You Mean?

Now, Inherent in ‘nothingness’ is energy that’s
infinitely small; depending on the nature of a given
setting, infinity tends to Reflect the Nature of the
Respective Setting In Question, thus Acquiring, as a
consequence, Discrete values. This infinitely small
energy generally Mirrors its macro image, and
therefore has an Inherent Dynamism that Sees To It
That Motion’s Maintained, this owing to the fact that
an energy-particle has a duality whose Essence’s
Underscored by its Summing of Opposites. It’s in the
course of continuously Striking a Balance Between
these opposites Via their Discrete Contributions that
go towards Constituting the Unifying Continuum that’s
space’s conditions, is it Derived the said inherent
dynamism, with discreteness pegged on the protocols
observed in that dance of opposites’ nature and mode
of interaction. 

As the Universe itself’s the Totality Of All that lt
Discretely Contains, as it’s generally known,
different energy-particles’ve different rates of
decay. Thus, an organism that’s constituted of
discrete energy forms’ll, similarly, decay at
different rates in different places before it’s said
that it’s completely decomposed. This is with due
regard to the fact that energy can neither be created
nor be destroyed. It can only be converted. That means
that as a result of these varied decay rates, varied
conversions into new discrete forms’re Simultaneously
Constantly taking place correspondingly also
–destruction’s a creative process in itself. These
varied energy conversions, therefore, mean that the
Totality that’s the Universe, similarly, Discretely
Came to Be, and Hence, Is Continuously Discretely
Becoming, with the foregoing implying as a Consequence
of Having Been Was. Past, Present Future, All rolled
into one by the mere fact of just Being. The
‘Individualness’ illustrated by the Different and
Discrete energy processes, is the Heart of All
Differential Processes, But Whose Nett Convergent
Result’s to’ve a Totality that’s Constantly Dynamic.
Doesn’t this Pierce the Very Heart of Maximum Entropy:
that All That Is, Temperaturewise Will someday Level
Out to Signal the End of the Universe? Concerning this
Leveling Out, it implies that –the Universe as a
Containment denoted by the word Totality- Work Has To
Be Done Towards Maintaining this Storage Facility.
But, as Sadi Carnot came to realize, heat, a form of
energy, must flow from a hot place to a cold one to do
work –heat Loss’ Necessary In order To Perform the
Work Required To’ve the storage facility Perform Its
Primary Task of preservation. But, Paradoxically, one
of maximum entropy’s attributes’ that It’s Also
Acknowledged as the Region Where molecular Motion’s
‘totally random’ [I’ve a bone to pick with this phrase
also, because taking into account the dynamism
inherent in All energy forms regardless of magnitude,
coupled with the aspect of the interplay of forces in
a given environmental setting, which energy forms
form, constitute and at the same time’re subjects of
the same, the word random shouldn’t arise as the said
energy forms Play According to Certain Rules of
Engagement Found in a Given Set of Conditions. Random
Infers Lawlessness.]

Thus, That Which We Want To See as An End In Itself,
Has, at the end of it all, ‘random motions’ Inherent
In It! That is, It Has Life. Perfection is, To the
Extent that It Has Inherent ‘Random Motions’,
Constantly Being Imperfected By the Spirit Of This
Dynamism. These ‘totally random’ motions’ as
exemplified by Planck’s constant per given ambient
conditions. And due to the Very Simple Fact that the
Universe’s Totality’s Constituted of varied and
discrete energy forms and processes, it therefore
means that All Fundamental Laws Of Science
Synergically Hold, with their Life’s Sum Symbolized by
the Integration of the above-stated Ambient Rules of
Engagement in the motions of the energy-particles,
Commonly Referred to as ‘total randomness’. 

Now, as regards order, there’s order in All Natural
Processes –for example, coal’s just one massive
molecule of carbon atoms that’re arranged in a pattern
that’s Very Orderly, with Their Totality –molecules-
Being Held in Their Respective Positions By Their
Mutual Attractions towards Each Other. This means
that, just like I’ve explained above, owing to this
orderliness observed from an Atomic to a Molecular
Level, then even at the Subatomic level, the Tenants
of these regions Obey Diplomatic Protocols pertaining
to the setting that they happen to be in, which sees
to it their eventual Unification in the form of an
atom. Order, order, order, From the Micro to the
Macro, Mr. Chris.

In this order, just like I’ve said of perfection’s
imperfection(s), Circumscribed Into It is an inherent
dynamism Epitomized by the [Constant] motions that’re
characterized by Planck’s constant per ambient
conditions. That is, this order Has Life Breathed Into
It that happens to be –to the perfectionist- “The good
womb that bears bad seeds” [Shakespeare], with this
being descriptive of the ‘random motions’, generally
Considered to be the Devil In the Details that Finely
Clause the concept of maximum entropy. It’s from this
perspective that Order Has ‘Disorder’. So, now, Chris,
my good friend, What’re You Telling Me when You State
that order’s manufactured by man? There’s No Way that
Man, as a Discrete Totality Conglomerated Of Varied
and Discrete energy forms, Manufactured Order –He Has
Never ‘Manufactured’ a Blade of Grass, Let Alone
Create Himself, Or Did He? He Found Order There. So,
tell me your statement was a slip of the keyboard. 

His Actions, Differentially speaking, by and large,
are Devastating, but that’s another story altogether. 

Finally, get rid of this mentality about being feasted
on by tigers et al. 

Nyankami.

--- Chris Albertson <chrisalbertson90278@yahoo.com>
wrote:
> 
> Arguing that there couldn't have been an "explosion"
> is kind of
> pointless.  The picture of a "big bang" is really
> just an
> analogy used to explain what happend to school
> children and
> non-scientists.  It's a gross onver-simplification
> made up
> for the general public.  
> 
> There is also a very good argument that there _is_
> no "order".
> "Order" is something manufactured by human brains so
> that humans
> can survive in the jungle and not be eaten by
> tigers.  The
> universe simply "is" it is us who make the order.
> 
> 
> 
> --- Nyankami Atandi <m_atandi@yahoo.com> wrote:
> > 
> > Good people,
> > 
> > the essence of the Big Bang infers that, as its
> name suggests, an
> > explosive action took place as a result of
> interactions that
> > contexted the creation process. But from
> experience, an explosion,
> > though we might try to contain it, we can only do
> so by limiting its
> > intensity, and thereby also its area, and not the
> dynamism inherent
> > in the said process. As an example, if we were to
> take a pressure
> > vessel and pressurize it till it explodes, we
> can’t say exactly where
> > pieces of it’re to fall after the explosion, even
> if a certain
> > portion of the vessel were given some kind of
> identification marking
> > pre-explosion. The foregoing therefore means
> disorder in the nature
> > of the final product.  
> > 
> > But when observing the Universe, or the Natural
> processes, one sees
> > order from the micro to the macro level. The
> spirit of it defeats
> > that which the Big Bang Theorem seeks to expound:
> that a Bang
> > couldn’t have occurred. Creation Was, Is and Will
> be orderly overall,
> > as connotative of Nature’s Integrative tendencies,
> but discrete, as
> > connotative of Its Differentiation tendencies.
> This is because the
> > Fundamental Principles that underlie all processes
> inasmuch as they
> > seem to ‘break down’ at the micro level, this can
> be explained by the
> > fact that they appear to do so as Functions of the
> Differentiations
> > of the myriad discrete energy forces involved at
> that micro level,
> > but whose per ambience Integrative nett result as
> the order starts to
> > assume a macro scale, is to’ve a semblance of
> ‘constantness’. This
> > situation, ‘contantness’, arises because the said
> discrete energy
> > forms’ll tend to combine and integrate forces to
> give us the ‘realm
> > of the observable’ that matter is as we know it,
> sensuously and
> > tactually speaking. Separative forces’re weaker,
> and tend to be
> > pronounced as mass assumes larger proportions,
> than the binding
> > forces. The overall result’s to give the forces
> that tend to separate
> > ‘negligible’ attributes. The point’s that the
> Hoyle-Bondi-Gold
> > “Steady State” Theory’s right in principle. The
> point of contention
> > in their concept arises of the “Out of nothing”
> proposal. What’s
> > “Nothing”, it could be asked; the more micro we
> tend to get is the
> > more we tend to find that energy ‘assumes
> negligible’ properties, or,
> > in other words, tends to be infinitely small. So,
> by intrapolation,
> > it can be said that inherent in “Nothingness”
> is/are energies at
> > discrete infinite levels, and happen to’ve [an]
> discrete inherent
> > dynamic attributes, symbolized by the essence of
> Planck’s constant’s
> > characteristics per given conditions. 
> > 
> > Nyankami. 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > ---------------------------------
> > Do you Yahoo!?
> > Yahoo! Platinum - Watch CBS' NCAA March Madness,
> live on your
> desktop!
> 
> 
> =====
> Chris Albertson
>   Home:   310-376-1029 
> chrisalbertson90278@yahoo.com
>   Cell:   310-990-7550
>   Office: 310-336-5189 
> Christopher.J.Albertson@aero.org
>   KG6OMK
> 
> __________________________________________________
> Do you Yahoo!?
> Yahoo! Platinum - Watch CBS' NCAA March Madness,
> live on your desktop!
> http://platinum.yahoo.com


=====


__________________________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Tax Center - File online, calculators, forms, and more
http://platinum.yahoo.com