[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Discrete Solar Influences.
Chris,
but the radiation flux has different values in
different places, thus meaning, fundamentally, that
the rate of a particular process in a certain
locality’ll be different from that of that in another.
Concerning the smallness of their effects, usually
assigned the term ‘negligible’, as man is generally
wont to do, do they Deserve to be Ignored At All? All
Energy forms, Irrespective of Magnitude, Left On Their
Own Tend To Culture, And Hence Acquire A Life Of Their
Own That Reflects The Nature Of The Ambient Conditions
That Nurtured Them, Because Inherent In These energy
forms Is An Inherent Dynamism That Sees to that
Conversion of the said energy forms From One Form To
Another’s Maintained. So, Small They might be, But
They’re Changes Nonetheless. And if they Tend To
Acquire A Life Of Their Own, What Can Be Said Of Their
Cumulative Effects ‘Behind The Scenes’ –Likewise,
Should They Be Ignored? Across the board, Man trips
over himself in Trying To Contain These ‘Unknown
Entities From Nowhere’ that’ve ‘suddenly reared’ their
ugly heads ‘without giving due notice of their eminent
coming’ [By Largely Ignoring Them, Man’s Attitude Saw
To It the Eventual Creation Of This Pandora’s box], by
Applying Ignoramus’ M O: Management By Crisis.
Relating to your points to ponder:
1]. It’s common knowledge that when two, or more,
systems’re in Resonance, It Requires A Minimum Amount
Of Energy To Maintain This resonance. If we were to
take our planetary system for example, inasmuch as All
its constituents’ve Developed resonances in their
respective orbits as they rotate about the sun, this
sun’ll not only correspondingly has a sum
gravitational pull, but is also Constantly Discretely
Being Affected by the gravitational fields of these
Different constituents. In addition to this, the
system’s also being affected, as it, too, affects its
immediate surroundings and so forth.
Now, about the solar radiation’s changes, in achieving
stability through resonance –if we start from an
atomic level- systems of energy-particles Loose some
of their energy In Order to Attain this End, whose
Ultimate Result’s that their Combined Strength’s Much
Greater Than That of Each Individual one, Taken
Separately. At that moment When they Mutually Agree To
Combine forces, as there’s a great deal of energy
Released, it Essentially means that momentarily
there’s increased reaction pertaining to their
Individual As Well As Combined Internal Processes, as
well as in their Momentums, too. If we apply this on a
stellar scale, this Energy Release could perhaps
explain the change’s greatness vis-à-vis the intrinsic
brightness of the sun. The more the number of systems
involved in this, the more intense the heat loss
through energy release.
Therefore, going by the same line of thought outlined
above, could one say that the sun’s expansion could be
as a result of Probably our solar system having
entered a region, or is in one, where there’re more
systems that it has to interact with per unit time
that sees to it its increase in mass, because by
virtue of its motion, it gains mass through kinetic
energy? That is, the sun, being our system’s common
centre, by being impacted -as it does the same to them
discretely too- by energy from these multitude
systems, absorbs these discrete quanta, and
consequently has motions that’re largely due to fact
that the said impacts changes our sun’s velocity as it
does those of the others, and which motions’re
reflective of the nature of the way these discrete
energies’re impacting it, which sees to it that it’s
constantly occupying varied positions temporarily,
such that upon assuming its centre position in our
system, it gives off the absorbed energy in the form
of increased heat.
2]. The same line of reasoning could be applied here.
Nyankami.
--- Chris Albertson <chrisalbertson90278@yahoo.com>
wrote:
>
>
> So if the sun gets hotter the Earth gets hotter?
> Not a
> really new idea.
>
>
> One line of study might be to measure the total
> radiation flux
> from the sun and see how this coorelates to climate
> change. You
> won't be the only person doing this. But it is hard
> to do
> because the effect is so small.
>
> Things to think about:
>
> 1): The Earth rotates. The day/night
> change on solar radiation is _far_ greater then any
> change in
> intristic brightness of the sun.
>
> 2) Atmosphere and oceans transport and store energy.
> Energy
> arriving by this methos is _far_ greater then any
> change in
> intristic brightness of the sun.
>
> --- Nyankami Atandi <m_atandi@yahoo.com> wrote:
> >
> > Good people,
> >
> > because discrete variations in the Earth’s
> characteristics that’re
> > localized in any particular area, apart from their
> being dependent on
> > the prevalent conditions of a given area and, by
> extension, those
> > that constitute the immediate surroundings,
> they’re also accentuated
> > by the Sun due to the fact that it’s the immediate
> common center of
> > our Planetary System, with the said changes –owing
> to the dictates of
> > entropy and the second thermodynamic law- then, it
> could be said,
> > being multiplied by Planck’s constant per the
> conditions given in a
> > respective ambience. This gives the stated changes
> miniscule or
> > ‘negligible’ properties.
> >
> >
> >
> > So, of the above, one could go on and say that
> were it to be given
> > expression in the form of an equation, it could be
> written as
> > follows:
> >
> > Changes attributable to conditions of a particular
> area = [Rate of
> > energy pressure (as these variations’re
> essentially of energy by
> > nature) applied/Area/Inertia characteristic of
> that area that can be
> > symbolized by variations of the locale’s magnetic
> field –a certain
> > empiric value could be assigned to the said
> area]x[Planck’s constant,
> > h, per temp, t, (their product being expressive of
> the constant
> > inherent or latent dynamism of a given ambience),
> h.t]x[Sun’s
> > variable energy impact on the locale (as a measure
> of changes that it
> > induces on the particular locality)/Locale’s
> area]x[Inverse of the
> > Sun’s square of its radial distance from the
> particular point on
> > Earth]. The foregoing then translates to:
> >
> > [Rate of applied energy pressure. Area’s
> > inertia/Area]x[h.t]x[Variable energy from the
> Sun/Area.Radius
> > squared].
> >
> > Nyankami.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > ---------------------------------
> > Do you Yahoo!?
> > Yahoo! Platinum - Watch CBS' NCAA March Madness,
> live on your
> desktop!
>
>
> =====
> Chris Albertson
> Home: 310-376-1029
> chrisalbertson90278@yahoo.com
> Cell: 310-990-7550
> Office: 310-336-5189
> Christopher.J.Albertson@aero.org
> KG6OMK
>
> __________________________________________________
> Do you Yahoo!?
> Yahoo! Platinum - Watch CBS' NCAA March Madness,
> live on your desktop!
> http://platinum.yahoo.com
=====
__________________________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Tax Center - File online, calculators, forms, and more
http://platinum.yahoo.com