Re: Full Data Set

[Tom Droege <tdroege2@earthlink.net>]

Folks, it is like shooting fish in a barrel.  There are plenty of things 
easily found.  Of course, there is not enough data on any one to get a 
definitive type classification, but some you can be pretty sure of event 
with only 10 points.

I will put a few up after I look them up in VisieR.  I tried to find ones 
that were not so obvious.  Small variations over a long period of 
time.  Small amplitude faint stars, etc..

There are 19,795 stars with WS > 20.  Most are really variable.  Possibly a 
third are convincing.

Tom Droege

At 11:36 PM 6/2/03 -0500, Tom Droege wrote:
>I just combined the old data set with the new.  There are 28 million 
>measurements of 2.5 million stars.  Many stars are measured hundreds of 
>times.  I am running collect_stars and the WS.  It will not be done until 
>morning.
>
>It is going to be fun to look at this data.  Soon Michael S. will have it 
>to put in the data base.
>
>Meanwhile, I will have a crack at it to see if I can show any really good 
>stuff.
>
>Tom Droege
>
>