RE: Variability statistics

["Thomas Droege" <tdroege2@earthlink.net>]

Sorry everyone for not fulfilling my duty to keep things stirred up.  Blame
a 2 week cold/flu and the creation of a calendar for the Rolls-Royce clup. 
These are now both over.

As you all may recall, I have built a big black box so that I can test
everything for a system in the lab.  I used to have to put a camera on a
telescope to see if it was working.  Now I have a screen and a lens all in
a big black box.  So far I do not have a complete set of working
components.  Sigh!  It is always a stuggle to get the first set of boards
working.  Then it goes much faster to repair a sick board.  

I have been doing a lot of computation with no positive result.  But I
thing I understand why, and am planning steps which should produce better
data in the future. 

Tom Droege


> [Original Message]
> From: Michael Sallman <msallman@pro-ns.net>
> To: Tass <tass@listserv.wwa.com>
> Date: 1/13/2004 7:44:21 PM
> Subject: Variability statistics
>
> Hello all,
>
> Happy New Year! The list has been awfully quiet lately, maybe I can
> liven things up a bit.
> I have been working on improving the reliability of the W-S statistic
> (or getting rid of the spurious detections, take your pick).