[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: NSVS/TASS/ASAS

To: tass List <tass@listserv.wwa.com>, Michael Koppelman <lolife@bitstream.net>
Subject: Re: NSVS/TASS/ASAS
From: Sebastian Otero <varsao@fullzero.com.ar>
Date: Sun, 06 Jun 2004 22:23:40 -0300
References: <410-2200460617734906@earthlink.net><2A3C93A2-B812-11D8-9C75-000A95C4DF7E@bitstream.net>
Sender: owner-tass@listserv.wwa.com

> http://www.lolife.com/astronomy/hd192169.jpg

> I checked to see if the TASS point near phase 0.6 where shifted one day  
> in either direction and that didn't help them. They might just be bad  
> points. The period looks pretty tight when you look at just the ASAS  
> and NSVS data.

It doesn't look too pretty to me. What about the secondary?
Actually, the period is 1.705523 days and it's a nice EA.
Of course, Tycho type "CWB" is totally meaningless...

Cheers,
Sebastian.

HD192169_NSVS.gif

Follow-Ups:
- Re: NSVS/TASS/ASAS
  - From: Michael Koppelman <lolife@bitstream.net>

References:
- RE: Mark IV data off by one day
  - From: Thomas Droege <tdroege2@earthlink.net>
- NSVS/TASS/ASAS
  - From: Michael Koppelman <lolife@bitstream.net>

Prev by Date: Re: Mark IV data off by one day
Next by Date: TASS Errors
Prev by thread: Re: NSVS/TASS/ASAS
Next by thread: Re: NSVS/TASS/ASAS
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread