Re: GSC 3493-1324 -- what's next?

["Dirk Terrell" <terrell@boulder.swri.edu>]

On Mon, 7 Jun 2004 10:17:18 -0500, Michael Koppelman wrote:

>I don't get why that is good. The IBVS should publish every new "just 
>another variable" so it get referenced in SIMBAD and becomes part of 
>the big, bad database. 

They _do_. It's their "New Discoveries" issue that they publish every
100 issues. See

http://www.konkoly.hu/IBVS/issues.html

and follow the "Reports on new discoveries" link. Also check out the
recent editorial note

http://www.konkoly.hu/IBVS/ednote2004.html

I think they've taken the right approach. It's good for us because
valuable data get published and it doesn't overwhelm their limited
resources.

Dirk