RE: Mark IV data off by one day

[Richard Klappal <klappal@xnet.com>]

That's almost beginning to sound like a lurking Y2K error in one of the time
conversion/translation routines-- It handled 2000 correctly, but then forgot
2000-handling after handling 2004! (or doubled, depending on the direction
of the offset)

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-tass@listserv.wwa.com [mailto:owner-tass@listserv.wwa.com]On
Behalf Of Patrick Wils
Sent: Friday, 11 June, 2004 20:30
To: tass@listserv.wwa.com
Subject: Re: Mark IV data off by one day



--- "Gary W. Billings" <obs681@telusplanet.net> wrote:
> Good work!  I agree the correction improves the fit, but I see there
> are a
> couple of datapoints, presumably from other nights, that phase to
> times of primary eclipse but do not show any dimming...

If I add 1 day to all points after the 29th of February, 2004 that
problem is also gone.

Patrick





__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Friends.  Fun.  Try the all-new Yahoo! Messenger.
http://messenger.yahoo.com/