[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Thank you for the answers
- To: Undisclosed recipients: ;
- Subject: Re: Thank you for the answers
- From: Tass Mailing List <tass@mail.alembic.net>
- Date: Thu, 14 Sep 2006 15:52:57 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Thu, 14 Sep 2006 17:20:48 -0500
From: Michael Sallman <msallman@pro-ns.net>
To: Tass Mailing List <tass@mail.alembic.net>
Subject: Re: Thank you for the answers
Martin,
As someone who has invested some time (though not nearly as much as
others), an very little money in this project, I would have to say that
I am anything but disappointed. I have enjoyed every minute of it. I
have had the opportunity to do some real science, interact with quite a
few professional astronomers, meet many really great people and LEARN A
HECK OF ALOT! And discover a variable star or too, as well. ;-)
I am truly sorry that you are disappointed. Luckily, you didn't have too
much invested in it.
Mike
Tass Mailing List wrote:
> Date: Thu, 14 Sep 2006 08:40:05 +0100 (BST)
> From: Martin Nicholson <newbinaries@yahoo.co.uk>
> To: tass@mail.alembic.net
> Cc: richmond@stupendous.cis.rit.edu
> Subject: Thank you for the answers
>
> Thank you to those people who took the trouble to respond to my queries.
>
> I have been on the fringes of the work for some years now but I am well aware of the time,
> trouble and money that many of you have invested in TASS.
>
> I do have to say that I am surprised - on reflection disappointed is perhaps a better word - that
> stars with a range in the downloadable data of around 0.7 magnitudes cannot be said to be of any
> particular significance.
>
> Martin Nicholson, BSc BA FRAS
> Director - International Consortium of Robotic Astronomical Researchers
> www.icrar.org
>
>