[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: TN-107
- To: Undisclosed recipients: ;
- Subject: Re: TN-107
- From: Tass Mailing List <tass@mail.alembic.net>
- Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2007 18:00:42 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2007 20:58:27 -0400
From: Doug Welch <welch@physics.mcmaster.ca>
To: Tass Mailing List <tass@mail.alembic.net>
Subject: Re: TN-107
Hi Tom,
Very interesting. Is there further improvement once Steve Bickerton's
analysis is run on the non-crowded stars?
Cheers,
Doug
Tass Mailing List wrote:
> Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2007 15:55:24 -0500
> From: Thomas F. Droege <droege@fastmail.fm>
> To: tass@tass-survey.org
> Subject: TN-107
>
> Hello Everyone,
>
> For years I have been trying to find something, *anything* that would
> improve the scatter of the tass data. I have looked at everything that
> I could think of. Does the bad data look better than the "good" data?
> No, when I, for example, take clear nights and compare them with hazy
> nights. Many other things have been examined with no success. Finally
> I have found something that seems to work. You will find it in TN-107:
>
> http://stupendous.rit.edu/tass/technotes/tn0107.html
>
> Andrew are you here?
>
> There is lots more to be done. I will work first on "how close is
> close". It is slow going since I am not very clever when under
> sedation. At least I figure that is as good an excuse as any.
>
> Tom Droege